lame benchmarks (pun intended)

[vox]

]

Please use Linux Mint 11 on both
http://mintppc.org/
Or Debian Wheezy on both and redo the math.

Looking forward to compare those tests to these and let us know of how much space there is for MOS and OS4 to grow on same hardware.

[amiga-penn-wchester]

benchmarks w/lame... how 1999 of you.

[vox]

benchmarks w/lame... how 1999 of you.

 please do MINT tests. You can run Mint 11 on all PPC Macs and X1000
64 bit on X1000, 32 bit on MacsPPC, just to get the right tech use.

http://www.mintppc.org/content/user-experiences
http://www.mintppc.org/forums/viewfo...6ff6341813fe07

[Piru]

Please use Linux Mint 11 on both
http://mintppc.org/
Or Debian Wheezy on both and redo the math.

Unfortunately no-one is willing to run benchmarks on their X1000 anymore. I wonder why that is...

Looking forward to compare those tests to these and let us know of how much space there is for MOS and OS4 to grow on same hardware.

Actually MorphOS is faster than Linux in some areas, so I don't see much point in these tests.

[gertsy]

Is there any way we could include an overclocked G4 mac mini? I've seen people getting theirs up to 1.8Ghz. I ask this as i am considering doing this to mine.

Cheers!

A requested, here's a picture of an overclocked Mac Mini running at 2.6Ghz.

[Tuxedo]

Can anyone plz add the lame test with x5000 plz?

[kolla]

And Vampire? lol

[Tuxedo]

And Vampire? lol

Why not?

[johnklos]

I want to see Vampire benchmarks, too!

It's interesting to see the progression:

Code: [Select]

33 MHz m68040 (Mac Quadra 605):
3582.799u 6700.611s 3:08:39.78 90.8%    0+0k 0+798io 6pf+0w

50 MHz m68060 (Amiga 1200, Blizzard 1260):
1324.752u 513.886s 31:25.96 97.4%       0+0k 0+556io 0pf+0w

1.5 GHz PowerPC G4 (Mac mini), no Altivec:
31.992u 0.470s 0:37.09 87.5% 0+0k 0+17io 5pf+0w

1.2 GHz Raspberry Pi 3:
30.575u 0.320s 0:34.71 88.9%    0+0k 0+16io 1pf+0w

2.05 GHz AMD Athlon 5350:
10.957u 0.119s 0:11.11 99.5% 0+0k 0+6io 0pf+0w

2.3 GHz NVIDIA Jetson TK1:
10.686u 0.129s 0:10.97 98.4%    0+0k 0+7io 2pf+0w

3.6 GHz AMD FX-8150:
5.641u 0.170s 0:05.81 100.0% 0+0k 0+3io 0pf+0w

4 GHz Core i7 6700k:
3.220u 0.050s 0:03.27 100.0%    0+0k 0+6io 0pf+0w

3.4 GHz AMD Threadripper 1950x:
2.956u 0.309s 0:03.62 89.7% 0+0k 0+3io 0pf+0wThat breaks down to this for performance (audio frame per second per MHz):

Code: [Select]

m68040: .031
m68060: .1145
PowerPC G4 (7447a): .216
ARM Cortex A53: .284
AMD Athlon 5350: .464
ARM Cortex A15: .423
AMD FX-8150: .5
Core i7 6700k: .805
AMD Threadripper: .948That means that, per MHz on LAME encoding, an AMD Threadripper is about thirty times faster than an m68040

[johnklos]

I should note that this doesn't take turbo clocks in to account.

[Nickman]

I want to see Vampire benchmarks, too!

What is the command line for the test?

[Tuxedo]

What is the command line for the test?

lame file.mp3

[Nickman]

lame file.mp3

That makes no sence at all too me. Doesnt Lame take an in file and output an mp3?
So what is the file to test and pack?

Is it part of some version? or on the official homepage?

[Tuxedo]

That makes no sence at all too me. Doesnt Lame take an in file and output an mp3?
So what is the file to test and pack?

Is it part of some version? or on the official homepage?

Sorry mate but...
on #6 piru links the fiel to test...didnt noticed?

[Nickman]

Sorry mate but...
on #6 piru links the fiel to test...didnt noticed?

No sorry did not. Thanks. will check it out,

[klx300r]

with lame v3.1 from OS4depot on X1000:

9.RAM Disk:lame-3.100/bin> lame AKsack.wav
LAME 3.100 32bits (http://lame.sf.net)
Using polyphase lowpass filter, transition band: 16538 Hz - 17071 Hz
Encoding AKsack.wav to AKsack.mp3
Encoding as 44.1 kHz j-stereo MPEG-1 Layer III (11x) 128 kbps qval=3
    Frame          |  CPU time/estim | REAL time/estim | play/CPU |    ETA
10529/10529 (100%)|    0:28/    0:28|    0:28/    0:28|   9.7744x|    0:00    
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   kbps        MS  %     long switch short %                                  
  128.0      100.0        74.4  13.4  12.2                                    
Writing LAME Tag...done
ReplayGain: +0.5dB