Amiga.org

Amiga News and Community Announcements => Amiga News and Community Announcements => Topic started by: x303 on December 24, 2012, 03:07:52 PM

Title: YAM 2.8 Released
Post by: x303 on December 24, 2012, 03:07:52 PM
Changes

  Here is a brief list of the most important changes since the 2.7 release in December 2011:
 
For more information on all implemented changes in YAM 2.8 please see the detailed ChangeLog file as well as the YAM 2.8 (http://yam.ch/milestone/YAM%202.8) information page.

You can find the download archive for your machine here: http://yam.ch/downloads
Title: Re: YAM 2.8 Released
Post by: ChaosLord on December 25, 2012, 08:51:11 AM
So which is better these days?  YAM or SimpleMail?

I used YAM for a few years (around late 1990s or early 2000s) but eventually I had 10,000 Amiga emails and YAM would take about 30 minutes to load and completely fraggle my memory into 100,000 useless fragments and make the whole computer go in slow motion like Windoze XP.  So I had to abandon YAM.  This all happened many years before Chris Hodges saved the Amiga with TLSFmem util.

Did YAM ever fix their "spam the memory pool" coding technique?

Or would I be forced to try SimpleMail?

Or just stick with using Chrome or Firefox + Yahoomail on a bgcpc?
Title: Re: YAM 2.8 Released
Post by: x303 on December 25, 2012, 10:50:45 AM
Quote from: ChaosLord;720273
So which is better these days?  YAM or SimpleMail?

I used YAM for a few years (around late 1990s or early 2000s) but eventually I had 10,000 Amiga emails and YAM would take about 30 minutes to load and completely fraggle my memory into 100,000 useless fragments and make the whole computer go in slow motion like Windoze XP.  So I had to abandon YAM.  This all happened many years before Chris Hodges saved the Amiga with TLSFmem util.

Did YAM ever fix their "spam the memory pool" coding technique?

Or would I be forced to try SimpleMail?

Or just stick with using Chrome or Firefox + Yahoomail on a bgcpc?

Don't have 10000 mails, more like 100. Works for me. But they fixed the indexing a while ago, so you should try it out yourself and see if it works now. Or else make a bugreport.