Ocriss wrote:
All,
I can't help but wonder if Apple pays reviewers. I mean all of their products seem to get glowing reviews and I don't understand why. Maybe it is just me.
I think it must be to do with the way Apple address human issues rather than technical ones.
The screen on the Macbook Pro is average. Sony, HP, and Toshiba laptops all have better screens. The screens on Apple notebooks are always about one generation behind the PC laptops.
I guess it's a matter of taste, but the screens on both my PowerBook and my MacBook are much better than The Sony and Toshiba laptops I also use... the Sony one has some kind of glossy/reflective coating that make it imposible to use in a normal environment. The Toshiba is a higher resolution than the apple, but much dimmer.
Has anyone sued Apple for being burned by the bottom of the laptop? The bottom of the laptop is very hot. I cannot believe that management let the product ship this way. I would think it would open them up to a potential lawsuit. In any event it is way too hot.
Yeah, they get hot! But, if that is the price to pay for a metal laptop without any bloody cooling vents on the bottom (stupid place to put fans!!) then so be it!
Those are two things I observed from messing with the thing for 5 minutes in the Apple store. How can these reviewers not be making major issues of these things when they have units to use for days before a review?
The reviews seemed pretty good to me... I have tried to be honest (and as impartial as possible) in my descriptions of the MacBook I have here.
The iPod is another big mystery to me. There are much better players out there. I bought one for my wife and was so ticked off. It looks like new and is dead 1 year and 1 month after purchase. I had to replace the screen on it myself once as well. The design is horrible.
I agree the older iPods were pretty lame... but the iPod nano is perfect for my needs.
There was a quote from Bill Gates saying that there are much better MP3 players on the market. I laughed because I always figure Bill is telling a story. This was one time he wasn't telling a tall tale. Bought the wife a Creative Nano to replace her iPod. She love it and so do I. Putting songs on it is so much easier. I don't have to mess with iTunes at all.
I rather like the iRiver mp3 players (they have loads of great features), but once you get to try them all, you soon get bored of them and realise you want one that just works and has a nice simple interface... enter the iPod.
I will never forget the nightmare I had with a Sony mp3 player...
I can just drag and drop songs to it like a memory stick. It has an FM tuner on it so I didn't have to pay money for an add on like I did on the iPod.
Radio? What's that?
I just don't get it. Is the Apple marketing department really that good?
Regards,
Ocriss
As I said earlier, I think apple have (since Jobs got back involved in '97) made a large effort to design devices that will appeal to "people" rather than to technophile (who want (x*y)^3 features, rather than elegant design). This is quite a good gimmick/strategy when trying to survive in the faceless technological market... if only Amiga Inc. had figured it out...
Apple also made a great decision by buying Emagic's "Logic Audio" and canceling the Windows version... thus any musician who wants to make quality music now has to by a Mac :-)
Also Apple are the only laptop maker to put a REAL FULL 6Wire Firewire port on their machines... As I use bus powered Firewire Music hardware, I need that very feature...