Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: MacOS X via PearPC  (Read 1263 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SeiyaTopic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2004
  • Posts: 380
    • Show only replies by Seiya
    • http://www.amigademo.tk
MacOS X via PearPC
« on: May 06, 2012, 10:07:36 AM »
Emulation..i don't know if it's the right thread, however.

Thirst test
http://youtu.be/SzWAvFZQ2ts

Second test:
http://youtu.be/Zz3zZB8psbg

Third test
http://youtu.be/22SSz0sNt4I

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show only replies by Piru
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: MacOS X via PearPC
« Reply #1 on: May 06, 2012, 11:53:32 AM »
Well it only confirms that it is still quite useless performance wise.

Considering how the emulation is limited to single core (and it cannot be easily distributed between multiple cores), it could take a while until the emulation can be useful solution.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2012, 11:57:07 AM by Piru »
 

Offline SeiyaTopic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2004
  • Posts: 380
    • Show only replies by Seiya
    • http://www.amigademo.tk
Re: MacOS X via PearPC
« Reply #2 on: May 06, 2012, 11:57:39 AM »
yes, macosx is complex os for pearpc maybe.
i like to see if an OS like MOS or OS4 could be emulated and with good performance..
but i think it's an impossible dream..

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show only replies by Piru
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: MacOS X via PearPC
« Reply #3 on: May 06, 2012, 12:30:34 PM »
Quote from: Seiya;691881
yes, macosx is complex os for pearpc maybe.
It has nothing to do with the OS. x86/amd64 are still just too slow.

The 3rd video shows some xbench results. Quickly comparing say "AltiVec Basic" result against PowerBook G4 1.67GHz: 22.15 vs 322.65. That is, PowerBook G4 1.67GHz is 14.6 times faster. Not quite G4 2.25GHz performance, but rather G4 114 MHz.

Other results are much closer of course, and in memory and memory bound results it can even be faster. However, when it comes to number crunching (especially AltiVec accelerated) the real deal is still considerably faster.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2012, 12:46:55 PM by Piru »