doctorq wrote:
Why do you think WB2.04 isn't the prefered OS on Amiga ?? Who said so ?? Where is the proof ??
Where do you see os 3.9 ??
Sounds to me now, that all you want to do at this point is to start an argument, and I simply can't be bothered...
I can give you no proof, but start a poll and see how many of the users here that uses WB2.04 as their everyday Amiga OS. Then you will have your proof, and I will even bet you a beer on it. By the way, I prefer Danish beer.
You shouldn't be bothered, noone is trying a copmpetetion in anything, my amigo.
There's no Internet to surf on, email to read, news to write read, or anything else to do on comps, much less Amigas or any kind of letter a anywhere, and you _are_ really talking about everyday use of wb1.3 in vast majority and of vastly better quality and feel than that socially by dumbasses not approved 2.04.
Hey?
Amiga.org - ring any bells?
No sociopathy - remember.
p.s.
What I want to say about 3.1 is that it's a dream 1200/4000 WB, (as is every other one at that), however in the early nineties or by the time when the Amiga show was over arround the world lacked the cultness, the firmness of peace, the laying of 2.04. And *still*, mu choice is 2.04 over 3.1. I'm confirming that here.
Nothing more, mate, a stand, a statement, an argument, a personality, a computer, happy and away, no me no you no hostile troops. (:pissed:)
