jkirk wrote:
@Narayan
i don't know why you are still in the dark ages. i chunked 2.04 many many moons ago on my a500. now i switch between 1.3 and 3.1. :-)
BTW: there is nothing wrong with 2.04 but 3.1 has more features. and newer os distributions require 3.1 (Well except 4.0 but that is a different story). :-D
For you my friend, I can only quote an entire message I wrotein comp.sys.amiga.misc about this very thread. Thank you not.
Now, I had this idea in which I'm first writng the subject then I'm off to the message. I've written the
subject, however stopped a bit. The guy is unbeliveable.
What are you, all against me?
So there's this thread on amiga.org "Some 2.04?" and I've written a few about it. Then the story goes and goes
and mainly, when 2 other '020 programs are set aside, and that that's all there were after "everything 1.3,
2.04, 3.1", it leaves us that we have these three OSes on Amiga and that one of them is 2.04.
Unfortunately, I am wrong here, and a very unapreciated member, a very socially unexepted stand to say the
least, when I say that I see the 2.04 superior to 3.1, and this
not because the 3.1 is less good or god forbid bad,
but because it was not finished as such, and a bit bonvivans WB, a bit unfinished, not all over and set.
So in the thread there was doctorq and everything was all right so far. He said his, I've said mine, and the
truth was clearly visible. The 2.04 as it is, with a black stripe for menues, a definite superiority over 3.1.
The thread continued and everything was more or less digested and it was allright, it was as it is.
Only to expect a low blow, one which is expecting that the thread is forgotten, and now that things weren't as
tightly explained as they were in the begining or while the thread lasted, this one comes in and more or less,
motherssonly says like it's not too important but that it's still the other way arround than it is, and with
that closes.
BTW The language (English) is completely and utterly unmanouvrable.
