Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Forums
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: 2560x1200 WB  (Read 4781 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Crumb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1786
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by Crumb
    • http://cuaz.sourceforge.net
Re: 2560x1200 WB
« Reply #29 from previous page: May 03, 2013, 03:53:25 PM »
@kickstart

Of course! Emulators are like "sex dolls"... not the same as real amigas :D
Logged
The only spanish amiga news web page/club: Club de Usuarios de Amiga de Zaragoza (CUAZ)
 

Offline Oldsmobile_Mike

Re: 2560x1200 WB
« Reply #30 on: May 03, 2013, 04:59:29 PM »
All of the computers I set up at my office have between 2-4 monitors.  I wonder if I could use WinUAE on one of these and have a 3840x2400 Workbench, or 3240x1920, or 5760x1080?  :D

Personally I always liked that Workbench could scroll out to 16384x16384, but I wonder how much chip ram that would eat up?  LOL.  :)
Logged
Amiga 500: 2MB Chip|16MB Fast|30MHz 68030+68882|3.9|Indivision ECS|GVP A500HD+|Mechware card reader + 8GB CF|Cocolino|SCSI DVD-RAM
Amiga 2000: 2MB Chip|136MB Fast|50MHz 68060|3.9|Indivision ECS + GVP Spectrum|Mechware card reader + 8GB CF|AD516|X-Surf 100|RapidRoad|Cocolino|SCSI CD-RW
 Amiga videos and other misc. stuff at https://www.youtube.com/CompTechMike/videos
 

Offline direktornTopic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2013
  • Posts: 78
    • Show only replies by direktorn
Re: 2560x1200 WB
« Reply #31 on: May 03, 2013, 06:44:16 PM »
Quote from: Oldsmobile_Mike;733630
All of the computers I set up at my office have between 2-4 monitors. I wonder if I could use WinUAE on one of these and have a 3840x2400 Workbench, or 3240x1920, or 5760x1080? :D
 
Personally I always liked that Workbench could scroll out to 16384x16384, but I wonder how much chip ram that would eat up? LOL. :)

I'm more a one-screen-fits-all guy - My neck hurts if I'd have to move all the time to different screens :)
Logged
 

Offline Thorham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 1149
    • Show only replies by Thorham
Re: 2560x1200 WB
« Reply #32 on: May 03, 2013, 07:55:00 PM »
Quote from: Oldsmobile_Mike;733630
Personally I always liked that Workbench could scroll out to 16384x16384, but I wonder how much chip ram that would eat up?  LOL.  :)

For a two color screen that would amount to 32 megabytes :D
Logged
 

Offline direktornTopic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2013
  • Posts: 78
    • Show only replies by direktorn
Re: 2560x1200 WB
« Reply #33 on: May 03, 2013, 11:01:08 PM »
Quote from: Thorham;733647
For a two color screen that would amount to 32 megabytes :D

Luckely GFX screens don't consume Chipmen..
Logged
 

Offline Thorham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 1149
    • Show only replies by Thorham
Re: 2560x1200 WB
« Reply #34 on: May 03, 2013, 11:19:15 PM »
Quote from: direktorn;733674
Luckely GFX screens don't consume Chipmen..

They were wondering about the chipmem usage :p
Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »