@ weirdami
this whole thing makes no sense.
Funny really.
I think your posts make no sense.
I will, indeed, gather all the info around the topic I proposed (I think it is a good idea, I'd do it even myself anyway) and make some place for it, give me a couple of weeks.
Why do you think it's a bad idea? Wouldn't you like the software groupped together in some convenient manner? Not? Then speak for yourself. Try to give some pros or cons or alternative examples instead your politics of denial.
@ Matt H
A) The Amiga doesn't have many office suites
2) Those that exist are rather old
iii) They're not freely distributable.
Office suite/apps was an example.
You gave three points - how long did it take you to figure it out? I can accept this status you mentioned about the office. But I want to have an answer in 60 seconds. Anytime I want the answer.
See my point?
Check Amiga Future's software database (ASD) for details as to what exists, then try to find it
I guess I've seen it already. But you mean manual searching, I mean getting the answer in seconds, without google.
@ SamuraiCrow
I wish the downloads at Apple.com were as centralized as Aminet.org rather than the other way around.
Me too, I mentioned versiontracker especially as OSX software source (mainly free), by quoting Apple site I meant look/feel plus search engine. I already said, it made me sick when some proprietary software I found had some A OS demands list as a list of hardware components actually.
BTW text files are not readable in my opinion (I mean in such pace), RICH site would make you check several things in 15 seconds instead.
@ myself
Some here claim it's a (distribution) policy, could be. It was also one considering this issue as yielding such an outcome about the existing repositories.
Freeware programs right. But what's the point about all proprietary stuff??? So many orders they can hardly handle? So whats really the point here?