Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: 2560x1200 WB  (Read 4780 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline direktornTopic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2013
  • Posts: 78
    • Show only replies by direktorn
2560x1200 WB
« on: May 02, 2013, 07:00:27 PM »
Impressive that an operating system older than the DVD format can display a picture with more pixels compared to Full HD..
 
https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=3b04ad50d6b195a3&id=3B04AD50D6B195A3%21306&action=Share
« Last Edit: May 02, 2013, 07:24:11 PM by direktorn »
 

Offline commodorejohn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 3165
    • Show only replies by commodorejohn
    • http://www.commodorejohn.com
Re: 2560x1200 WB
« Reply #1 on: May 02, 2013, 07:11:43 PM »
I'd look, but this SkyDrive bullcrap won't let me because *haughty sniff* my browser isn't new enough. In the future, you might want to put this kind of stuff on a less stupid service like ImageShack.
Computers: Amiga 1200, DEC VAXStation 4000/60, DEC MicroPDP-11/73
Synthesizers: Roland JX-10/MT-32/D-10, Oberheim Matrix-6, Yamaha DX7/FB-01, Korg MS-20 Mini, Ensoniq Mirage/SQ-80, Sequential Circuits Prophet-600, Hohner String Performer

"\'Legacy code\' often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling." - Bjarne Stroustrup
 

Offline Dr.Bongo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2003
  • Posts: 342
    • Show only replies by Dr.Bongo
    • http://www.c64radio.com
Re: 2560x1200 WB
« Reply #2 on: May 02, 2013, 07:23:02 PM »
What system specs is that running on?
38911 BASIC BYTES FREE, less when I`ve had a drink!

 *** http://c64radio.com *** Commodore 64 Radio 24/7 for free!
 

Offline direktornTopic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2013
  • Posts: 78
    • Show only replies by direktorn
Re: 2560x1200 WB
« Reply #3 on: May 02, 2013, 07:26:48 PM »
Quote from: commodorejohn;733522
I'd look, but this SkyDrive bullcrap won't let me because *haughty sniff* my browser isn't new enough. In the future, you might want to put this kind of stuff on a less stupid service like ImageShack.

Sorry but I really hate to have to upload things and ImageShack has loads of banners and **** :(
 
You can view images on Skydrive by loading the image url, here :)
https://public.dm1.livefilestore.com/y1pp121BpexhQLXzfEqjBIz-tR8H8hsrz_NAI1Hi3fXaSykHCsmOJih1nTmGUxXeLEn/CyberGrab2560.jpg?psid=1
 

Offline direktornTopic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2013
  • Posts: 78
    • Show only replies by direktorn
Re: 2560x1200 WB
« Reply #4 on: May 02, 2013, 07:29:38 PM »
Quote from: Dr.Bongo;733523
What system specs is that running on?

I filed it under Emulation, might give you a clue? :-)
 
WinUAE running on a i7 machine. 512M FastRam, 24-bit desktop, a few GB of storage (I copied my original Amiga 4000 HD plugging it in using a USB-IDE adapter/converter)
 

Offline Oldsmobile_Mike

Re: 2560x1200 WB
« Reply #5 on: May 02, 2013, 08:01:19 PM »
Tried to look but just got a loading icon for about five minutes.  What the he^# is SkyDrive hosted on that it bogs down my entire browser, a Commodore 64?  Maybe just upload your image onto Amiga.org.  ;)
Amiga 500: 2MB Chip|16MB Fast|30MHz 68030+68882|3.9|Indivision ECS|GVP A500HD+|Mechware card reader + 8GB CF|Cocolino|SCSI DVD-RAM
Amiga 2000: 2MB Chip|136MB Fast|50MHz 68060|3.9|Indivision ECS + GVP Spectrum|Mechware card reader + 8GB CF|AD516|X-Surf 100|RapidRoad|Cocolino|SCSI CD-RW
 Amiga videos and other misc. stuff at https://www.youtube.com/CompTechMike/videos
 

Offline direktornTopic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2013
  • Posts: 78
    • Show only replies by direktorn
Re: 2560x1200 WB
« Reply #6 on: May 02, 2013, 08:31:20 PM »
Quote from: Oldsmobile_Mike;733529
Tried to look but just got a loading icon for about five minutes. What the he^# is SkyDrive hosted on that it bogs down my entire browser, a Commodore 64? Maybe just upload your image onto Amiga.org. ;)

Did you try the direct url? That worked fine in IBrowse, not sure what crappy browser you'r using.
 

Offline commodorejohn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 3165
    • Show only replies by commodorejohn
    • http://www.commodorejohn.com
Re: 2560x1200 WB
« Reply #7 on: May 02, 2013, 08:34:53 PM »
Yeah, sure, use a crappy service and then blame the browser.
Computers: Amiga 1200, DEC VAXStation 4000/60, DEC MicroPDP-11/73
Synthesizers: Roland JX-10/MT-32/D-10, Oberheim Matrix-6, Yamaha DX7/FB-01, Korg MS-20 Mini, Ensoniq Mirage/SQ-80, Sequential Circuits Prophet-600, Hohner String Performer

"\'Legacy code\' often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling." - Bjarne Stroustrup
 

Offline Oldsmobile_Mike

Re: 2560x1200 WB
« Reply #8 on: May 02, 2013, 08:36:56 PM »
Quote from: direktorn;733532
Did you try the direct url? That worked fine in IBrowse, not sure what crappy browser you'r using.


Opera, IE, Firefox, all latest versions and on different computers, always had problems accessing content hosted on that crappy site.  Maybe I should be using IBrowse, LOL.  ;)  Oh well, saw it on the direct link, looks good, now to get it to work on a real Amiga!  ;)
Amiga 500: 2MB Chip|16MB Fast|30MHz 68030+68882|3.9|Indivision ECS|GVP A500HD+|Mechware card reader + 8GB CF|Cocolino|SCSI DVD-RAM
Amiga 2000: 2MB Chip|136MB Fast|50MHz 68060|3.9|Indivision ECS + GVP Spectrum|Mechware card reader + 8GB CF|AD516|X-Surf 100|RapidRoad|Cocolino|SCSI CD-RW
 Amiga videos and other misc. stuff at https://www.youtube.com/CompTechMike/videos
 

Offline Crumb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1786
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by Crumb
    • http://cuaz.sourceforge.net
Re: 2560x1200 WB
« Reply #9 on: May 02, 2013, 08:37:09 PM »
Some years ago I created a 2000x1500 8bit screenmode with mi PicassoIV just for fun :-)
The only spanish amiga news web page/club: Club de Usuarios de Amiga de Zaragoza (CUAZ)
 

Offline kickstart

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2006
  • Posts: 1057
    • Show only replies by kickstart
Re: 2560x1200 WB
« Reply #10 on: May 02, 2013, 08:39:49 PM »
Quote from: Crumb;733535
Some years ago I created a 2000x1500 8bit screenmode with mi PicassoIV just for fun :-)


nice... and this on a real amiga.
a1200 060
 

Offline Khephren

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 606
    • Show only replies by Khephren
Re: 2560x1200 WB
« Reply #11 on: May 02, 2013, 09:08:14 PM »
cool, but loses it's appeal when it's not the real hardware.
 

Offline direktornTopic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2013
  • Posts: 78
    • Show only replies by direktorn
Re: 2560x1200 WB
« Reply #12 on: May 02, 2013, 09:49:39 PM »
Quote from: Crumb;733535
Some years ago I created a 2000x1500 8bit screenmode with mi PicassoIV just for fun :-)

About 17 years ago i ran 1600x1200 in 16 or 24 bit (cant remember) on Apple 21" fixed monitor http://www.apple-forever.com/detail/148.html that only support a 1152 resolution.
 

Offline direktornTopic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2013
  • Posts: 78
    • Show only replies by direktorn
Re: 2560x1200 WB
« Reply #13 on: May 02, 2013, 09:50:11 PM »
Quote from: Khephren;733539
cool, but loses it's appeal when it's not the real hardware.

Might be, but as this is the UAE forum what would one expect ... :quickdraw:
 

Offline TheBilgeRat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 1657
    • Show only replies by TheBilgeRat
Re: 2560x1200 WB
« Reply #14 on: May 03, 2013, 12:10:22 AM »
Quote from: direktorn;733525
I filed it under Emulation, might give you a clue? :-)
 
WinUAE running on a i7 machine. 512M FastRam, 24-bit desktop, a few GB of storage (I copied my original Amiga 4000 HD plugging it in using a USB-IDE adapter/converter)


Now that's a load of horse leavings right there.  Man.

But still pretty sexy :D